top of page

Center For Sustainable Development International

Landing Page.png
Content Page.png
Nav Page.png

Context

wheel barrow.png
plant.png
plant.png

Overview

Center For Sustainable Development (CSDi) is a service providing education on climate change and conservation. I performed a heuristic evaluation on the current website, and used insights gained from research to redesign the current website to increase in-site purchases in the North American markets

Client

Center For Sustainable Development

Product

Responsive website

Duration

4 weeks

Role

Solo Project

UX Designer

UX Researcher

Tools

Figma, Wordpress, Maze

Business Problem

Center For Sustainable Development has faced a steady decline of in-site class purchases from individuals in North America since 2019. The current site has not been updated since 2016

Business Goal

Center For Sustainable Development wants to increase program sign-ups in North America, specifically environmentally stricken areas

Bounce.png

92 percent visitor bounce rate

Earth Icon.png

Wants to increase sales 60 percent this year

down arrow.png

Sales down 65 percent since last year

snowflake icon.png
Tornado Icon.png
lightening bolt icon.png

Target cities impacted heavily by climate change

Design Challenge

How might we update the current website and increase class sign-ups in the North American market

Group 473.png

Increase usability of website to promote sign-ups and reduce bounce rate

Design Process

design system.png

Usability testing results

Iterations

Microsoft Fluent

Current site usability test

Heuristic Evaluation

User flow

Prototype

Competitive analysis

Information Architecture

Frame 36.png

Usability Test

I conducted usability tests with 6 different users aged 21-45 in North America as that is the target user

Why?

I did a usability test on the current site to identify downfalls and usability issues that are contributing to a decrease in in-site class sign-ups. Ideally these usability issues can be addressed and iterated on to improve site functionality

Usability Test Focus

  • Understanding navigation

  • Using search function 

  • Identifying class categories/ sub cate

  • Finding a class users are interested in

  • The process to sign up for a class

 

Usability Test Insights

Rectangle 249.png
Mental Map.png

Many links open new tabs with no back option, frustrating users

Question.png
Hidden Search.png
Back arrow.png

Users struggled to create a mental map of website

Hidden search function caused irritation and disabled the users happy path

Users experience cognitive overload upon homepage arrival

Competitive Analysis

I completed a competitive analysis with 4 other educational websites, and 1 e-commerce site including Udemy, Coursera, General Assembly, and Amazon.

Why?

I completed a competitive analysis to identify important UI features as well as navigation flows of other sites to incorporate into CSDi's website to make it more efficient and usable.

Analysis Focus

  • Search function location and implementation

  • Understanding information architecture and navigation

  • Understanding product card layout and displaying relevant information

  • Identify key accessibility features offered on other websites
     

Frame 8.png

Competitive Analysis Insights

Rectangle 251.png

CSDi does not have clear branding leading to a feeling of distrust

branding icon.png
language icon.png
product info icon.png

CSDi, although an international product, does not offer an alternative language option

CSDi does not provide basic product information to showcase their products. Instead provides too much information

Heuristic Evaluation

I completed a heuristic evaluation on the current website using 10 usability heuristics from Jakob Nielson

Why?

I completed a heuristic evaluation on the current website to identify usability issues that are causing a decline in class sign ups and a significantly high bounce rate among users.

Unclear that these are clickable links

Group 477.png

Unclear if 'Consulting' is part of the navigation and a clickable link

Unclear what page the user is currently visiting in navigation. User should always be aware of where they are on the site at all times

Text says account, but icon is a shopping cart

Unclear if 'How to start course' is part of navigation or not

This graphic provides no real value or information to user

Product cards are text heavy and have a high cognitive load

Unfamiliar CTA style. No consistency in website

This link takes user to anchor on current page

'Learn more' CTAs not specific enough for user

Secondary navigation is unorganized and not intuitive. Some links take user to new tab, and some links take user to new page on site

Large amount of text over image leads to poor accessibility and usability

Vector.png

Site does not include alternative language option, eve though site claims to be international

Vector.png

Site does not provide a search option for users to quickly find specific information

Vector.png

Site does not have a structured navigation leading to no mental model for users

Vector.png

Site is very content-heavy and leads to poor decision making from users and possibly no decision being made at all

Heuristic Evaluation Insights

Rectangle 268.png
Group 354.png
🦆 icon _Text Bullet List Square Warning_.png
🦆 icon _Apps_.png
Eye group.png

Site lacks Consistency and Standards and users often unsure of the result of certain actions

Current site lacks Visibility of System Status. Users are unaware of what is going on while using the site

Current site lacks Aesthetic and Minimalist Design. Information is dense and often unnecessary 

Users quickly experience cognitive overload due to excessive information on both homepage and product pages

Frame 361.png

Information Architecture

I created an information architecture utilizing course information provided by the stakeholder and an open card sort to gain insights on course organization

Why?

The original Information Architecture was proven to be extremely confusing based on my research. In order to redesign the website, first, the Information Architecture had to be redesigned to build a mental model and understand how the information would be displayed on the site

Current IA

Vector.png

Secondary navigation on every page, not located in header

Vector.png

No organization to secondary navigation

Vector.png

Some links take user to external page, some open page on same tab

Group 469.png

Proposed IA

Group.png

Navigation located in header, no longer on every page

Group.png

Courses organized by categories, determined in open card sort

Group.png

Users can view every course available to them at CSDi 

Group 470.png

Information Architecture Insights

Rectangle 269.png
Group 479.png
Group 480.png
🦆 icon _Text Bullet List Square_.png

Proposed AI allows user to see all courses available on site in one location

Proposed AI has a dedicated navigation for all courses instead of listing all courses on each page

Original AI had secondary navigation on almost every page with no organization, simply a list of links

User Flow

From my research, and speaking with the main stakeholder, the main goal for users is to efficiently find specific courses and purchase those courses.

Why?

I created a user flow to visually represent the path users will take from arriving on the landing page, selecting a course, and checking out. CSDis website essentially functions as an e-commerce site, so ensuring the users can efficiently proceed to check out to purchase a product is the main goal.

Group 481.png

User Flow Insights

Rectangle 269.png

New user flow allows user to purchase class or continue browsing, reducing bounce rate

Eye group.png
carbon_email.png
logos_facebook.png
logos_google-gmail.png
Line 321.png
🦆 icon _Lock_.png
🦆 icon _Search_.png

Original User Flow follows similar steps, but CTAs and steps are hidden from user

Original checkout process is lengthy and does not offer option for Google, Facebook, or email sign in

Frame 362.png
Rectangle 269.png

Microsoft Fluent

For the website redeisgn, I chose to use Microsoft Fluent Design System. The current site lacks any consistency regarding overall design, CTAs, color, or style

logos_microsoft-icon.png

Why?

I chose Microsoft Fluent because the stakeholder was already familiar with the design and interaction of Microsoft products. I wanted to focus on the needs of the stakeholder to make a product that could be efficiently implemented and understood without a steep learning curve

Prototype

The initial design iteration features a new layout, design system, and navigation among finer details, as well as limiting the cognitive load placed on the user upon arriving to the site.

Frame 38.png

Website Homepage Initial Iteration

My first iteration of the homepage utilizes insights gained from my comparative analysis to create an approachable and easily digestible landing page showcasing featured classes as well as utilizing Microsoft Fluent

MacBook Pro 14_ - 21.png
Frame 37.png
MacBook Pro 14_ - 21.png

Navigation Initial Iteration

The most critical flaw in the current site based on my research and usability tests, is the lack of a centralized navigation. Using information gathered from the stakeholder, I was able to get a full course list. Using an open card sort, I was able to organize all classes into different groups

Frame 391.png

Similarly to the homepage, the original product pages were text heavy and failed to provide any information hierarchy leading to cognitive loss and information overload. Additionally, the CTA to sign up for courses was located at the bottom of the page, and not immediately available to the users

Product Page Initial Iteration

Group 330.png
Group 331.png
MacBook Pro 14_ - 22.png
Frame 363.png

Usability Test

I completed a Usability Test of the initial prototype using Maze. I had a total of 8 users complete two usability tasks as well as answer 4 follow-up questions

Why?

Vector.png

8 total users

🦆 icon _Chat Help_.png

4 follow-up questions

I completed a Usability test to identify usability flaws in my first iteration of the design. Any usability issues that arise will be identified, iterated upon, and tested again.

Usability Test Insights

Rectangle 269.png
Group2.png
🦆 icon _People_.png
🦆 icon _Office Apps_.png
Shape.png

Several users stated they would have liked to see the price of each class listed on the product card

100 percent of users completed both tasks successfully

2 users stated confusion with the 'folder' style navigation layout

1 user stated they were not familiar with the 'Waffle' icon

Frame 363.png
Frame 40.png

Navigation Iteration

Based on the feedback received from my usability test, although users completed the task successfully, two users made comments regarding the navigation being unfamiliar

First iteration Navigation

Group 472.png

Proposed Navigation

Group 482.png

Looking back on my research, specifically my comparative analysis, I identified websites laid out their navigation with overarching main categories, and subcategories with drop-down or expandable sections to show all content available to users

My proposed navigation utilizes what I have learned from the comparative analysis and provides a more familiar and usable navigation

Frame 41.png

Waffle Icon Iteration

Although only one user reported being unfamiliar with the waffle icon, it is important to take into consideration all usability input and accessibility issues. Based on other websites and my personal experience, I agree that the waffle icon is not as familiar as other icons that express navigation action.

MacBook Pro 14_ - 23.png
Frame 42.png

Product Card Price Addition

One user from my usability test stated they would have preferred to see the course price on the product card, before clicking on the course. However, when I brought this design decision to my stakeholder, he protested and was not interested in including the course price on the product card. 

Ultimately, this is his website and company. I can only be an advocate for UX Design and design decisions. I provided ample information, examples from other sites, and data from my research to convince him otherwise, but he is holding firm on his decision.

Group 484.png

Final Product

Frame 36.png

Stakeholder

Over the course of this project, the biggest challenge I overcame was collaborating with individuals who have no experience working with UX Designers. I really had to be an advocate for UX design and explain not only will it benefit users' goals, but also benefit the business goals

The primary stakeholder had no prior experience working with User Experience Design and struggled to appreciate and incorporate the nuances and details that went into designs

Design System

Working with a developed design system like Microsoft Fluent was a huge benefit for myself as well as the stakeholder. Working within the constraints of a design system was a great experience and allowed me to be more productive and ultimately create a more uniform and cohesive product.

My stakeholder also appreciated it, as he was familiar with Microsoft products so it eliminated a steep learning curve for him to implement the design into his website.

bottom of page